convex combination
- North America > United States > Colorado > Boulder County > Boulder (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol > Trentino Province > Trento (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Tōhoku > Iwate Prefecture > Morioka (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- Europe > Italy > Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol > Trentino Province > Trento (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Tōhoku > Iwate Prefecture > Morioka (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
Embedding Space Interpolation Beyond Mini-Batch, Beyond Pairs and Beyond Examples
Mixup refers to interpolation-based data augmentation, originally motivated as a way to go beyond empirical risk minimization (ERM). Its extensions mostly focus on the definition of interpolation and the space (input or embedding) where it takes place, while the augmentation process itself is less studied. In most methods, the number of generated examples is limited to the mini-batch size and the number of examples being interpolated is limited to two (pairs), in the input space. We make progress in this direction by introducing MultiMix, which generates an arbitrarily large number of interpolated examples beyond the mini-batch size, and interpolates the entire mini-batch in the embedding space.
Bias Detection via Signaling
We introduce and study the problem of detecting whether an agent is updating their prior beliefs given new evidence in an optimal way that is Bayesian, or whether they are biased towards their own prior. In our model, biased agents form posterior beliefs that are a convex combination of their prior and the Bayesian posterior, where the more biased an agent is, the closer their posterior is to the prior. Since we often cannot observe the agent's beliefs directly, we take an approach inspired by information design . Specifically, we measure an agent's bias by designing a signaling scheme and observing the actions the agent takes in response to different signals, assuming that the agent maximizes their own expected utility. Our goal is to detect bias with a minimum number of signals. Our main results include a characterization of scenarios where a single signal suffices and a computationally efficient algorithm to compute optimal signaling schemes.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Kosovo > District of Gjilan > Kamenica (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Iraq (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- Europe > Czechia > Prague (0.04)